Mainstream Media has Massive Liberal Bias = FACT

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,996
Tokens
[ I laugh my ass off when liberals call FOX "faux", and then they lap up
the leftist pablum spoon fed to them by George Soros paid-off MSM ]


Why Don't We Hear About Soros' Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations?

By Dan Gainor
Published May 11, 2011
| FoxNews.com
Soros-397-AP.jpg

AP

Editor's note: This is the first of a two part series on George Soros and the media.
When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio , it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists' ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”


This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.
The investigative reporting start-up ProPublica is a prime example. ProPublica, which recently won its second Pulitzer Prize, initially was given millions of dollars from the Sandler Foundation to “strengthen the progressive infrastructure” – “progressive” being the code word for very liberal. In 2010, it also received a two-year contribution of $125,000 each year from the Open Society Foundations. In case you wonder where that money comes from, the OSF website is www.soros.org. It is a [COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important][COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important]network[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] of more than 30 international foundations, mostly funded by Soros, who has contributed more than $8 billion to those efforts.

The ProPublica stories are thoroughly researched by top-notch staffers who used to work at some of the biggest news outlets in the nation. But the topics are almost laughably left-wing. The site’s proud list of “Our Investigations” includes attacks on oil companies, gas companies, the health care [COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important][COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important]industry[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR], for-profit schools and more.


More than 100 stories on the latest lefty cause: opposition to drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracking. Another 100 on the evils of the foreclosure industry.
Throw in a couple investigations making the military look bad and another about prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and you have almost the perfect [COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important][COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important]journalism[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR] fantasy – a huge budget, lots of major media partners and a liberal agenda unconstrained by advertising.
One more thing: a 14-person Journalism Advisory Board, stacked with CNN’s David Gergen and representatives from top newspapers, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal and the editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster. Several are working journalists, including:


• Jill Abramson, a managing editor of The New York Times;
• Kerry Smith, the senior vice president for editorial quality of ABC News;
• Cynthia A. Tucker, the editor of the editorial page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
ProPublica is far from the only Soros-funded organization that is stacked with members of the supposedly neutral press.
The Center for Public Integrity is another great example. Its board of directors is filled with working journalists like Amanpour from ABC, right along side blatant liberal media types like Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post and now AOL.
Like ProPublica, the CPI board is a veritable Who’s Who of journalism and top media organizations, including:
• Christiane Amanpour – Anchor of ABC’s Sunday morning political affairs [COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important][COLOR=blue !important][FONT=inherit !important]program[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][/COLOR], “This Week with Christiane Amanpour.” A reliable lefty, she has called tax cuts “giveaways,” the Tea Partyextreme,” and Obama “very Reaganesque.
• Paula Madison – Executive vice president and chief diversity officer for NBC Universal, who leads NBC Universal’s corporate diversity initiatives, spanning all broadcast television, cable, digital, and film properties.
• Matt Thompson – Editorial product manager at National Public Radio and an adjunct faculty member at the prominent Poynter Institute.
Once again, like ProPublica, the center’s investigations are mostly liberal – attacks on the coal industry, payday loans and conservatives like Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. The Center for Public Integrity is also more open about its politics, including a detailed investigation into conservative funders David and Charles Koch and their “web of influence.”According to the center’s own 990 tax forms, the Open Society Institute gave it $651,650 in 2009 alone.
The well-known Center for Investigative Reporting follows the same template – important journalists on the board and a liberal editorial agenda. Both the board of directors and the advisory board contain journalists from major news outlets. The board features:
• Phil Bronstein (President), San Francisco Chronicle;
• David Boardman, The Seattle Times;
• Len Downie, former Executive Editor of the Washington Post, now VP;
• George Osterkamp, CBS News producer.
Readers of the site are greeted with numerous stories on climate change, illegal immigration and the evils of big companies. It counts among its media partners The Washington Post, Salon, CNN and ABC News. CIR received close to $1 million from Open Society from 2003 to 2008.
Why does it all matter? Journalists, we are constantly told, are neutral in their reporting. In almost the same breath, many bemoan the influence of money in politics. It is a maxim of both the left and many in the media that conservatives are bought and paid for by business interests. Yet where are the concerns about where their money comes from?
Fred Brown, who recently revised the book “Journalism Ethics: A Casebook of Professional Conduct for News Media,” argues journalists need to be “transparent” about their connections and “be up front about your relationship” with those who fund you.
Unfortunately, that rarely happens. While the nonprofits list who sits on their boards, the news outlets they work for make little or no effort to connect those dots. Amanpour’s biography page, for instance, talks about her lengthy career, her time at CNN and her many awards. It makes no mention of her affiliation with the Center for Public Integrity.
If journalists were more up front, they would have to admit numerous uncomfortable connections with groups that push a liberal agenda, many of them funded by the stridently liberal George Soros. So don’t expect that transparency any time soon.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011...es-30-major-news-organizations/#ixzz1MAGomxje
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
Zit, might carry a little more weight if it wasn't a Fox article. Having ties to someone doesn't always mean he is controlling content.I have ties to numerous sports books but have no input as to how they do business.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
If you are gonna fight the left wing bias of the media, you can't do it by showing right wing bias. It may make you feel better, but it does nothing to resolve the problem. If in fact anyone wants the problem resolved.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,996
Tokens
No doubt that Fox tries to show the other side of the issues. So you've got 5+ networks against 1. Wheeeeeeee....
 

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
What is needed is a media fact check organization with no bias whatsoever. Won't happen however because there is much more money to be made off of the us vs. them mentality.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
Zit, might carry a little more weight if it wasn't a Fox article. Having ties to someone doesn't always mean he is controlling content.I have ties to numerous sports books but have no input as to how they do business.

Ya, but you’re not worth billions. And he uses his money to curry favors.

And before any Libs tell me that Joe Blow does the same thing, I’m all for capitalism, he can spend his money on anything and everything he chooses.

For the amount he spends, you’d think he get better results.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,008
Tokens

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Messages
39,612
Tokens
God damn. I'm rich!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Next time Soros tells me what to post I can tell him to fuck off.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Zit, might carry a little more weight if it wasn't a Fox article. Having ties to someone doesn't always mean he is controlling content.I have ties to numerous sports books but have no input as to how they do business.

Judge: come on, Soros backs a media that does nothing but track Fox. Where else you going to get stuff like that.
Soros is the Wizard of Oz (the man behind the curtain that is). At least Murdock doesn't hide.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
Russ? Rusty? There you are.

Wayne Newton is hitting on mom. Its all part of the act Russ.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,301
Messages
13,566,294
Members
100,782
Latest member
tlsmithjr21
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com